BA vs VT: Correlation
Boeing (BA) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.60.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BA and VT?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BA and VT correlate at 0.60, strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.57 over 1 year against 0.60 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.59, with an annualized covariance of 300.8 %².
Few assets follow BA as closely as VT, which ranks #2 of 37 tracked partners. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months VT outperformed by 33.6 percentage points (-10.9% for BA against +22.7% for VT). The rolling one-year correlation moved between 0.32 and 0.72 over the past three years, a moderate range. Note the risk asymmetry: BA runs 2.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BA vs VT: side by side
| BA (Boeing) | VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -10.9% | +22.7% |
| 5-year return | -3.6% | +67.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 36.4% | 13.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.43 | 0.92 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -48.3% | -16.5% |
| Market cap | $165.9B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 76.3 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.59% |
| Expense ratio | – | 0.06% |
| Assets under management | – | $97.9B |
| Sector / category | Industrials | ETF · Global |
VT is a Global Large-Stock Blend fund from Vanguard: $97.9B under management, 5308 holdings, a 0.06% expense ratio, a 1.59% trailing dividend yield.
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BA | VT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -5.4% | -18.0% |
| 2023 | +36.8% | +22.0% |
| 2024 | -32.1% | +16.5% |
| 2025 | +22.7% | +22.4% |
| 2026 | -3.3% | +15.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Fund exposure
BA represents 0.22% of VT's portfolio, so part of any move in VT is BA itself, and the correlation between them is partly mechanical.
Are BA and VT good diversifiers for each other?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.60 means BA and VT share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BA and VT?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.60 over 3 years, with 0.57 over the last year and 0.59 over 5 years.
Is VT a good diversifier for BA?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.60 means BA and VT share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
What does a correlation of 0.60 mean?
A reading of 0.60 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ba-vs-vt.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ba-vs-vt/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BA correlations · VT correlations
