BA vs VXZ: Correlation
Boeing (BA) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.51.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BA and VXZ?
On 3 years of weekly data the BA/VXZ correlation comes out at -0.51, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.53 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.49, and annualized covariance runs at -470.6 %².
Out of 37 assets tracked against BA, VXZ lands near the bottom at #36. Over the last 12 months BA came out ahead by 5.2 percentage points (-10.9% against -16.1%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BA vs VXZ: side by side
| BA (Boeing) | VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -10.9% | -16.1% |
| 5-year return | -3.6% | -53.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 36.4% | 25.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.43 | -1.31 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -48.3% | -36.4% |
| Market cap | $165.9B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 76.3 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | – |
| Sector / category | Industrials | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BA | VXZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -5.4% | +0.5% |
| 2023 | +36.8% | -44.0% |
| 2024 | -32.1% | -12.7% |
| 2025 | +22.7% | +5.7% |
| 2026 | -3.3% | -10.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BA and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.51, BA and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BA and VXZ?
The BA/VXZ correlation stands at -0.51 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.53, 5 years: -0.49), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is VXZ a good diversifier for BA?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.51, BA and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.51 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ba-vs-vxz.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ba-vs-vxz/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BA correlations · VXZ correlations
