ALMS vs VRT: Correlation
How closely do Alumis Inc. (ALMS) and Vertiv (VRT) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.26, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are ALMS and VRT?
Over the past 3 years, ALMS and VRT moved with a correlation of -0.26, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.15) than the 3-year average (-0.26). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -2007.5 %².
By 3-year correlation, VRT places #71 of the 92 assets tracked against ALMS. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with ALMS ahead by 263.2 points (+371.7% versus +108.5%). One caveat on sizing: ALMS is 2.3 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
ALMS vs VRT: side by side
| ALMS (Alumis Inc.) | VRT (Vertiv) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +371.7% | +108.5% |
| 5-year return | n/a | +847.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 130.0% | 57.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -1.50 | 2.36 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -78.9% | -61.3% |
| Market cap | $3.0B | $103.7B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 59.6 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.07% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Industrials |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | ALMS | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | -45.3% |
| 2023 | – | +251.8% |
| 2024 | – | +136.8% |
| 2025 | +24.2% | +42.8% |
| 2026 | +137.8% | +66.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are ALMS and VRT good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.26 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between ALMS and VRT?
The ALMS/VRT correlation stands at -0.26 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.15, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is VRT a good diversifier for ALMS?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.26 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.26 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/alms-vs-vrt.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/alms-vs-vrt/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: ALMS correlations · VRT correlations
