ALMS vs SNT: Correlation
Alumis Inc. (ALMS) and Senstar Technologies Corporation (SNT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.31.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are ALMS and SNT?
Over the past 3 years, ALMS and SNT moved with a correlation of -0.31, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.24 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -2965.9 %².
Within ALMS's tracked universe of 92 assets, SNT comes in at #86 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months ALMS outperformed by 433.7 percentage points (+371.7% for ALMS against -62.0% for SNT). Risk is not evenly split, since ALMS carries 2.0 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
ALMS vs SNT: side by side
| ALMS (Alumis Inc.) | SNT (Senstar Technologies Corporation) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +371.7% | -62.0% |
| 5-year return | n/a | -57.3% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 130.0% | 66.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -1.50 | 0.71 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -78.9% | -69.2% |
| Market cap | $3.0B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 85.5 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | ALMS | SNT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | -57.7% |
| 2023 | – | +2.4% |
| 2024 | – | +166.7% |
| 2025 | +24.2% | +40.4% |
| 2026 | +137.8% | -64.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are ALMS and SNT good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.31, ALMS and SNT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between ALMS and SNT?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ALMS and SNT is -0.31 over 3 years, -0.24 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.
Is SNT a good diversifier for ALMS?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.31, ALMS and SNT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.31 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.31 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/alms-vs-snt.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/alms-vs-snt/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: ALMS correlations · SNT correlations
