PairBook
HomeALMS › ALMS vs RRC

ALMS vs RRC: Correlation

How closely do Alumis Inc. (ALMS) and Range Resources Corporation (RRC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.28, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.28
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.18
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1234.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ALMS and RRC?

On 3 years of weekly data the ALMS/RRC correlation comes out at -0.28, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.18 versus -0.28 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -1234.0 %².

By 3-year correlation, RRC places #79 of the 92 assets tracked against ALMS. The last year tells two different stories: ALMS led by 347.4 percentage points, +371.7% for ALMS against +24.3% for RRC. One caveat on sizing: ALMS is 3.9 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ALMS vs RRC: side by side

ALMS (Alumis Inc.)RRC (Range Resources Corporation)
1-year return+371.7%+24.3%
5-year returnn/a+195.2%
Volatility (ann.)130.0%33.0%
Beta vs S&P 500-1.500.34
Max drawdown (3Y)-78.9%-28.0%
Market cap$3.0B$9.7B
P/E (trailing)11.5
Dividend yield0.00%0.91%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: RRC 0.91% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: RRC -28.0% vs -78.9%
-11%0%+558%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ALMS · RRC

Year-by-year returns

YearALMSRRC
2022+41.1%
2023+23.1%
2024+19.3%
2025+24.2%-1.0%
2026+137.8%+18.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ALMS and RRC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.28, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ALMS and RRC?

The ALMS/RRC correlation stands at -0.28 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.18, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is RRC a good diversifier for ALMS?

Yes: at -0.28, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/alms-vs-rrc.json

ALMS vs RRC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.28ALMS vs RRC-0.28

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![ALMS vs RRC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/alms-vs-rrc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/alms-vs-rrc/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ALMS correlations · RRC correlations