PairBook
HomeALMS › ALMS vs NMTC

ALMS vs NMTC: Correlation

Alumis Inc. (ALMS) and NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation (NMTC) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.29.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.29
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.04
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2905.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ALMS and NMTC?

Over the past 3 years, ALMS and NMTC moved with a correlation of -0.29, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.04 versus -0.29 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -2905.8 %².

Within ALMS's tracked universe of 92 assets, NMTC comes in at #83 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with ALMS ahead by 427.7 points (+371.7% versus -56.0%). One caveat on sizing: ALMS is 1.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ALMS vs NMTC: side by side

ALMS (Alumis Inc.)NMTC (NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation)
1-year return+371.7%-56.0%
5-year returnn/a-91.3%
Volatility (ann.)130.0%83.8%
Beta vs S&P 500-1.501.16
Max drawdown (3Y)-78.9%-86.8%
Market cap$3.0B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: ALMS -78.9% vs -86.8%
-66%0%+558%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ALMS · NMTC

Year-by-year returns

YearALMSNMTC
2022-38.1%
2023+31.7%
2024-47.7%
2025+24.2%-8.2%
2026+137.8%-56.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ALMS and NMTC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.29, ALMS and NMTC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ALMS and NMTC?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ALMS and NMTC is -0.29 over 3 years, -0.04 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is NMTC a good diversifier for ALMS?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.29, ALMS and NMTC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.29 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/alms-vs-nmtc.json

ALMS vs NMTC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.29ALMS vs NMTC-0.29

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ALMS vs NMTC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/alms-vs-nmtc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/alms-vs-nmtc/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ALMS correlations · NMTC correlations