PairBook
HomeALMS › ALMS vs EQT

ALMS vs EQT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Alumis Inc. (ALMS) and EQT Corporation (EQT) carry a correlation of -0.27, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.27
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.18
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1208.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ALMS and EQT?

On 3 years of weekly data the ALMS/EQT correlation comes out at -0.27, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.18 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -1208.1 %².

Within ALMS's tracked universe of 92 assets, EQT comes in at #72 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months ALMS outperformed by 363.8 percentage points (+371.7% for ALMS against +7.9% for EQT). One caveat on sizing: ALMS is 3.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ALMS vs EQT: side by side

ALMS (Alumis Inc.)EQT (EQT Corporation)
1-year return+371.7%+7.9%
5-year returnn/a+224.8%
Volatility (ann.)130.0%34.1%
Beta vs S&P 500-1.500.52
Max drawdown (3Y)-78.9%-31.6%
Market cap$3.0B$34.3B
P/E (trailing)12.7
Dividend yield0.00%1.19%
Sector / categoryUS ListedEnergy
Higher yield: EQT 1.19% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: EQT -31.6% vs -78.9%
-11%0%+558%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ALMS · EQT

Year-by-year returns

YearALMSEQT
2022+57.6%
2023+16.2%
2024+21.4%
2025+24.2%+17.6%
2026+137.8%+3.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ALMS and EQT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.27, ALMS and EQT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ALMS and EQT?

The ALMS/EQT correlation stands at -0.27 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.18, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is EQT a good diversifier for ALMS?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.27, ALMS and EQT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/alms-vs-eqt.json

ALMS vs EQT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.27ALMS vs EQT-0.27

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ALMS vs EQT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/alms-vs-eqt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/alms-vs-eqt/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ALMS correlations · EQT correlations