PairBook
HomeALMS › ALMS vs DIS

ALMS vs DIS: Correlation

How closely do Alumis Inc. (ALMS) and Walt Disney Company (The) (DIS) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.16, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.16
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.09
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-600.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ALMS and DIS?

On 3 years of weekly data the ALMS/DIS correlation comes out at -0.16, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.09) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.16). The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -600.6 %².

By 3-year correlation, DIS places #19 of the 92 assets tracked against ALMS. The last year tells two different stories: ALMS led by 379.9 percentage points, +371.7% for ALMS against -8.2% for DIS. One caveat on sizing: ALMS is 4.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ALMS vs DIS: side by side

ALMS (Alumis Inc.)DIS (Walt Disney Company (The))
1-year return+371.7%-8.2%
5-year returnn/a-38.8%
Volatility (ann.)130.0%27.7%
Beta vs S&P 500-1.500.96
Max drawdown (3Y)-78.9%-32.9%
Market cap$3.0B$184.4B
P/E (trailing)22.6
Dividend yield0.00%1.37%
Sector / categoryUS ListedCommunication Services
Higher yield: DIS 1.37% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: DIS -32.9% vs -78.9%
-21%0%+558%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ALMS · DIS

Year-by-year returns

YearALMSDIS
2022-43.9%
2023+4.3%
2024+24.4%
2025+24.2%+3.3%
2026+137.8%-5.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ALMS and DIS good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.16, ALMS and DIS have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ALMS and DIS?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.16 over 3 years, with 0.09 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is DIS a good diversifier for ALMS?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.16, ALMS and DIS have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.16 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/alms-vs-dis.json

ALMS vs DIS: 3-year weekly correlation -0.16ALMS vs DIS-0.16

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ALMS vs DIS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/alms-vs-dis.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/alms-vs-dis/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ALMS correlations · DIS correlations