PairBook
HomeALMS › ALMS vs CNK

ALMS vs CNK: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Alumis Inc. (ALMS) and Cinemark Holdings Inc Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK) carry a correlation of -0.24, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.24
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1259.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ALMS and CNK?

On 3 years of weekly data the ALMS/CNK correlation comes out at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.24 over 1 year against -0.24 over 3. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -1259.9 %².

By 3-year correlation, CNK places #57 of the 92 assets tracked against ALMS. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months ALMS outperformed by 328.9 percentage points (+371.7% for ALMS against +42.8% for CNK). Note the risk asymmetry: ALMS runs 3.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ALMS vs CNK: side by side

ALMS (Alumis Inc.)CNK (Cinemark Holdings Inc Cinemark Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return+371.7%+42.8%
5-year returnn/a+119.9%
Volatility (ann.)130.0%40.6%
Beta vs S&P 500-1.500.29
Max drawdown (3Y)-78.9%-38.4%
Market cap$3.0B$4.2B
P/E (trailing)20.8
Dividend yield0.00%0.94%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: CNK 0.94% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CNK -38.4% vs -78.9%
-15%0%+558%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ALMS · CNK

Year-by-year returns

YearALMSCNK
2022-46.3%
2023+62.7%
2024+119.9%
2025+24.2%-24.1%
2026+137.8%+58.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ALMS and CNK good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ALMS and CNK?

The ALMS/CNK correlation stands at -0.24 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.24, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is CNK a good diversifier for ALMS?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

A reading of -0.24 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/alms-vs-cnk.json

ALMS vs CNK: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24ALMS vs CNK-0.24

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ALMS vs CNK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/alms-vs-cnk.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/alms-vs-cnk/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ALMS correlations · CNK correlations