ALMS vs C: Correlation
Alumis Inc. (ALMS) and Citigroup (C) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.17.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are ALMS and C?
On 3 years of weekly data the ALMS/C correlation comes out at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.08) than the 3-year average (-0.17). The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -682.5 %².
Within ALMS's tracked universe of 92 assets, C comes in at #25 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months ALMS outperformed by 331.8 percentage points (+371.7% for ALMS against +39.9% for C). One caveat on sizing: ALMS is 4.3 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
ALMS vs C: side by side
| ALMS (Alumis Inc.) | C (Citigroup) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +371.7% | +39.9% |
| 5-year return | n/a | +119.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 130.0% | 30.3% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -1.50 | 1.39 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -78.9% | -31.3% |
| Market cap | $3.0B | $222.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 14.4 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.80% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Financials |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | ALMS | C |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | -22.1% |
| 2023 | – | +19.0% |
| 2024 | – | +41.9% |
| 2025 | +24.2% | +70.4% |
| 2026 | +137.8% | +15.4% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are ALMS and C good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.17 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between ALMS and C?
The ALMS/C correlation stands at -0.17 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.08, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is C a good diversifier for ALMS?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.17 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/alms-vs-c.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/alms-vs-c/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: ALMS correlations · C correlations
