PairBook
HomeWALD › WALD vs WLK

WALD vs WLK: Correlation

How closely do Waldencast plc - Class A (WALD) and Westlake Corporation (WLK) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.20, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.39
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.16
long-run
Ann. covariance
-726.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are WALD and WLK?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of WALD and WLK correlate at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.39) than the 3-year average (-0.20). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.16, with an annualized covariance of -726.2 %².

By 3-year correlation, WLK places #9 of the 14 assets tracked against WALD. Neither side won the trailing year by much: -16.0% against -11.8%. Risk is not evenly split, since WALD carries 2.4 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

WALD vs WLK: side by side

WALD (Waldencast plc - Class A)WLK (Westlake Corporation)
1-year return-16.0%-11.8%
5-year return-86.1%-8.0%
Volatility (ann.)95.0%39.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.480.82
Max drawdown (3Y)-93.4%-64.2%
Market cap$0.2B$9.4B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%2.84%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: WLK 2.84% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: WLK -64.2% vs -93.4%Higher 5y return: WLK -8.0% vs -86.1%
-52%0%+73%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. WALD · WLK

Year-by-year returns

YearWALDWLK
2022-8.8%+6.8%
2023+20.6%+38.4%
2024-63.3%-16.9%
2025-53.2%-33.8%
2026-27.7%+1.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are WALD and WLK good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, WALD and WLK have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between WALD and WLK?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.20 over 3 years, with -0.39 over the last year and -0.16 over 5 years.

Is WLK a good diversifier for WALD?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, WALD and WLK have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/wald-vs-wlk.json

WALD vs WLK: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20WALD vs WLK-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![WALD vs WLK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/wald-vs-wlk.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/wald-vs-wlk/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: WALD correlations · WLK correlations