PairBook
HomeICCC › ICCC vs WALD

ICCC vs WALD: Correlation

ImmuCell Corporation (ICCC) and Waldencast plc - Class A (WALD) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.43
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.19
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1047.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ICCC and WALD?

Over the past 3 years, ICCC and WALD moved with a correlation of -0.24, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.43) than the 3-year average (-0.24). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.19, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1047.1 %².

Out of 13 assets tracked against ICCC, WALD lands near the bottom at #11. The last year tells two different stories: ICCC led by 80.3 percentage points, +64.3% for ICCC against -16.0% for WALD. Note the risk asymmetry: WALD runs 2.1 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ICCC vs WALD: side by side

ICCC (ImmuCell Corporation)WALD (Waldencast plc - Class A)
1-year return+64.3%-16.0%
5-year return+10.8%-86.1%
Volatility (ann.)45.2%95.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.010.48
Max drawdown (3Y)-40.0%-93.4%
Market cap$0.1B$0.2B
P/E (trailing)143.1
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: ICCC -40.0% vs -93.4%Higher 5y return: ICCC +10.8% vs -86.1%
-52%0%+77%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ICCC · WALD

Year-by-year returns

YearICCCWALD
2022-23.8%-8.8%
2023-16.6%+20.6%
2024+1.2%-63.3%
2025+19.4%-53.2%
2026+62.9%-27.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ICCC and WALD good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ICCC and WALD?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.24 over 3 years, with -0.43 over the last year and -0.19 over 5 years.

Is WALD a good diversifier for ICCC?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.24 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/iccc-vs-wald.json

ICCC vs WALD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24ICCC vs WALD-0.24

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![ICCC vs WALD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/iccc-vs-wald.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/iccc-vs-wald/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ICCC correlations · WALD correlations