PairBook
HomeURI › URI vs ZCMD

URI vs ZCMD: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, United Rentals (URI) and Zhongchao Inc. - Class A (ZCMD) carry a correlation of -0.17, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.19
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-958.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are URI and ZCMD?

On 3 years of weekly data the URI/ZCMD correlation comes out at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.19 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.12, and annualized covariance runs at -958.5 %².

By 3-year correlation, ZCMD places #32 of the 37 assets tracked against URI. The last year tells two different stories: URI led by 110.1 percentage points, +10.2% for URI against -99.9% for ZCMD. Risk is not evenly split, since ZCMD carries 3.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

URI vs ZCMD: side by side

URI (United Rentals)ZCMD (Zhongchao Inc. - Class A)
1-year return+10.2%-99.9%
5-year return+204.1%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)39.5%141.8%
Beta vs S&P 5001.420.59
Max drawdown (3Y)-37.0%-100.0%
Market cap$64.6B
P/E (trailing)25.4
Dividend yield0.71%0.00%
Sector / categoryIndustrialsUS Listed
Higher yield: URI 0.71% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: URI -37.0% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: URI +204.1% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+32%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). URI · ZCMD

Year-by-year returns

YearURIZCMD
2022+7.0%-35.4%
2023+63.6%-69.5%
2024+24.0%-53.8%
2025+15.9%-72.2%
2026+29.0%-99.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are URI and ZCMD good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.17 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between URI and ZCMD?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.17 over 3 years, with -0.19 over the last year and -0.12 over 5 years.

Is ZCMD a good diversifier for URI?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.17 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/uri-vs-zcmd.json

URI vs ZCMD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17URI vs ZCMD-0.17

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![URI vs ZCMD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/uri-vs-zcmd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/uri-vs-zcmd/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: URI correlations · ZCMD correlations