PairBook
HomeTAC › TAC vs XLU

TAC vs XLU: Correlation

TransAlta Corporation (TAC) and Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.42.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.42
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.46
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.42
long-run
Ann. covariance
239.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are TAC and XLU?

On 3 years of weekly data the TAC/XLU correlation comes out at 0.42, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.46) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.42, and annualized covariance runs at 239.8 %².

By 3-year correlation, XLU places #5 of the 10 assets tracked against TAC. Neither side won the trailing year by much: +4.3% against +4.1%. Risk is not evenly split, since TAC carries 2.3 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

TAC vs XLU: side by side

TAC (TransAlta Corporation)XLU (Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return+4.3%+4.1%
5-year return+36.9%+46.3%
Volatility (ann.)36.2%15.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.840.26
Max drawdown (3Y)-43.3%-13.1%
Market cap$4.0B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield2.10%2.70%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$23.1B
Sector / categoryUS ListedSector ETF
Higher yield: XLU 2.70% vs 2.10%Smaller drawdown: XLU -13.1% vs -43.3%Higher 5y return: XLU +46.3% vs +36.9%

XLU is an Utilities fund from State Street Investment Management: $23.1B under management, 31 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 2.70% trailing dividend yield.

-4%0%+44%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. TAC · XLU

Year-by-year returns

YearTACXLU
2022-18.0%+1.4%
2023-5.6%-7.2%
2024+74.0%+23.3%
2025-9.5%+16.0%
2026-0.7%+2.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are TAC and XLU good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.42, TAC and XLU keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between TAC and XLU?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between TAC and XLU is 0.42 over 3 years, 0.46 over 1 year and 0.42 over 5 years.

Is XLU a good diversifier for TAC?

Reasonably. At 0.42, TAC and XLU keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.42 mean?

A reading of 0.42 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/tac-vs-xlu.json

TAC vs XLU: 3-year weekly correlation 0.42TAC vs XLU0.42

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![TAC vs XLU correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/tac-vs-xlu.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/tac-vs-xlu/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: TAC correlations · XLU correlations