PairBook
HomePPCB › PPCB vs TAC

PPCB vs TAC: Correlation

Propanc Biopharma, Inc. (PPCB) and TransAlta Corporation (TAC) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.21
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.21
long-run
Ann. covariance
-8440905.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PPCB and TAC?

Over the past 3 years, PPCB and TAC moved with a correlation of -0.24, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.21) than the 3-year average (-0.24). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.21, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -8440905.3 %².

Within PPCB's tracked universe of 43 assets, TAC comes in at #24 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: TAC led by 101.3 percentage points, -97.0% for PPCB against +4.3% for TAC. Risk is not evenly split, since PPCB carries 26579.9 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PPCB vs TAC: side by side

PPCB (Propanc Biopharma, Inc.)TAC (TransAlta Corporation)
1-year return-97.0%+4.3%
5-year return-99.9%+36.9%
Volatility (ann.)962193.8%36.2%
Beta vs S&P 500-3746.200.84
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.8%-43.3%
Market cap$4.0B
P/E (trailing)0.0
Dividend yield0.00%2.10%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: TAC 2.10% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: TAC -43.3% vs -99.8%Higher 5y return: TAC +36.9% vs -99.9%
-98%0%+44%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). PPCB · TAC

Year-by-year returns

YearPPCBTAC
2022-98.6%-18.0%
2023-98.0%-5.6%
2024-98.3%+74.0%
2025+134050.0%-9.5%
2026-83.4%-0.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PPCB and TAC good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PPCB and TAC?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.24 over 3 years, with 0.21 over the last year and -0.21 over 5 years.

Is TAC a good diversifier for PPCB?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ppcb-vs-tac.json

PPCB vs TAC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24PPCB vs TAC-0.24

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![PPCB vs TAC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ppcb-vs-tac.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ppcb-vs-tac/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PPCB correlations · TAC correlations