PairBook
HomeSWK › SWK vs VXZ

SWK vs VXZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.43, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.43
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.50
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.45
long-run
Ann. covariance
-391.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are SWK and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of SWK and VXZ correlate at -0.43, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.50) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.45, with an annualized covariance of -391.3 %².

Among the 55 assets we track against SWK, VXZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #55. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SWK outperformed by 53.1 percentage points (+37.0% for SWK against -16.1% for VXZ).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

SWK vs VXZ: side by side

SWK (Stanley Black & Decker)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+37.0%-16.1%
5-year return-39.1%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)35.4%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.19-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-48.3%-36.4%
Market cap$15.0B
P/E (trailing)24.4
Dividend yield3.33%
Sector / categoryIndustrialsUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -48.3%Higher 5y return: SWK -39.1% vs -53.1%
-18%0%+37%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. SWK · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearSWKVXZ
2022-58.9%+0.5%
2023+35.6%-44.0%
2024-15.2%-12.7%
2025-3.2%+5.7%
2026+36.5%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are SWK and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.43, SWK and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between SWK and VXZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.43 over 3 years, with -0.50 over the last year and -0.45 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for SWK?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.43, SWK and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.43 mean?

A reading of -0.43 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/swk-vs-vxz.json

SWK vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.43SWK vs VXZ-0.43

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![SWK vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/swk-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/swk-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: SWK correlations · VXZ correlations