PairBook
HomeSTT › STT vs TFC

STT vs TFC: Correlation

State Street Corporation (STT) and Truist Financial (TFC) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.72.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.72
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.62
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.70
long-run
Ann. covariance
463.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are STT and TFC?

Over the past 3 years, STT and TFC moved with a correlation of 0.72, which is strong. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.62 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.70, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 463.8 %².

Within STT's tracked universe of 32 assets, TFC comes in at #9 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with STT ahead by 60.6 points (+72.7% versus +12.1%). On a rolling one-year basis the correlation drifted between 0.56 and 0.90, a moderate band.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

STT vs TFC: side by side

STT (State Street Corporation)TFC (Truist Financial)
1-year return+72.7%+12.1%
5-year return+144.9%+12.7%
Volatility (ann.)22.9%28.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.971.07
Max drawdown (3Y)-25.7%-26.9%
Market cap$53.1B$61.4B
P/E (trailing)17.111.6
Dividend yield1.74%4.10%
Sector / categoryFinancialsFinancials
Lower P/E: TFC 11.6 vs 17.1Higher yield: TFC 4.10% vs 1.74%Smaller drawdown: STT -25.7% vs -26.9%Higher 5y return: STT +144.9% vs +12.7%
-9%0%+76%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. STT · TFC

Year-by-year returns

YearSTTTFC
2022-13.8%-23.5%
2023+3.5%-8.6%
2024+30.2%+23.7%
2025+35.5%+19.0%
2026+52.6%+5.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are STT and TFC good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.72 means STT and TFC share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between STT and TFC?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.72 over 3 years, with 0.62 over the last year and 0.70 over 5 years.

Is TFC a good diversifier for STT?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.72 means STT and TFC share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.72 mean?

A reading of 0.72 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/stt-vs-tfc.json

STT vs TFC: 3-year weekly correlation 0.72STT vs TFC0.72

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![STT vs TFC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/stt-vs-tfc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/stt-vs-tfc/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: STT correlations · TFC correlations