PairBook
HomeSTT › STT vs XLF

STT vs XLF: Correlation

State Street Corporation (STT) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.76.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.76
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.68
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.80
long-run
Ann. covariance
281.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are STT and XLF?

On 3 years of weekly data the STT/XLF correlation comes out at 0.76, strong. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.68 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.80, and annualized covariance runs at 281.7 %².

Few assets follow STT as closely as XLF, which ranks #1 of 32 tracked partners. The last year tells two different stories: STT led by 63.4 percentage points, +72.7% for STT against +9.3% for XLF. Across three years, the rolling one-year figure varied moderately, from 0.61 to 0.89.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
One-year correlation, rolled weekly across the last three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

STT vs XLF: side by side

STT (State Street Corporation)XLF (Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return+72.7%+9.3%
5-year return+144.9%+64.2%
Volatility (ann.)22.9%16.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.970.84
Max drawdown (3Y)-25.7%-15.5%
Market cap$53.1B
P/E (trailing)17.1
Dividend yield1.74%1.42%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$57.9B
Sector / categoryFinancialsSector ETF
Higher yield: STT 1.74% vs 1.42%Smaller drawdown: XLF -15.5% vs -25.7%Higher 5y return: STT +144.9% vs +64.2%

XLF is a Financial fund from State Street Investment Management: $57.9B under management, 77 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 1.42% trailing dividend yield.

-9%0%+76%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). STT · XLF

Year-by-year returns

YearSTTXLF
2022-13.8%-10.6%
2023+3.5%+12.0%
2024+30.2%+30.6%
2025+35.5%+14.9%
2026+52.6%+6.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Fund exposure

A structural note: 0.65% of XLF is STT itself, so the fund partly moves with the stock by construction.

Are STT and XLF good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.76 means STT and XLF share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between STT and XLF?

The STT/XLF correlation stands at 0.76 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.68, 5 years: 0.80), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is XLF a good diversifier for STT?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.76 means STT and XLF share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.76 mean?

A reading of 0.76 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/stt-vs-xlf.json

STT vs XLF: 3-year weekly correlation 0.76STT vs XLF0.76

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![STT vs XLF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/stt-vs-xlf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/stt-vs-xlf/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: STT correlations · XLF correlations