PairBook
HomeSMH › SMH vs TXN

SMH vs TXN: Correlation

How closely do VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Texas Instruments (TXN) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.63, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.63
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.65
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.68
long-run
Ann. covariance
730.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are SMH and TXN?

On 3 years of weekly data the SMH/TXN correlation comes out at 0.63, strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.65) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.68, and annualized covariance runs at 730.5 %².

Among the 88 assets we track against SMH, TXN ranks #56 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: SMH led by 60.0 percentage points, +93.1% for SMH against +33.1% for TXN. On a rolling one-year basis the correlation drifted between 0.50 and 0.83, a moderate band.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
How the one-year correlation itself moved over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

SMH vs TXN: side by side

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF)TXN (Texas Instruments)
1-year return+93.1%+33.1%
5-year return+332.8%+60.4%
Volatility (ann.)33.7%34.3%
Beta vs S&P 5001.911.28
Max drawdown (3Y)-35.7%-33.4%
Market cap$243.4B
P/E (trailing)40.6
Dividend yield2.15%
Sector / categoryETF · ThematicInformation Technology
Smaller drawdown: TXN -33.4% vs -35.7%Higher 5y return: SMH +332.8% vs +60.4%
-14%0%+126%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. SMH · TXN

Year-by-year returns

YearSMHTXN
2022-33.5%-9.9%
2023+73.4%+6.4%
2024+39.1%+13.1%
2025+49.2%-4.5%
2026+59.1%+56.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are SMH and TXN good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.63 means SMH and TXN share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between SMH and TXN?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between SMH and TXN is 0.63 over 3 years, 0.65 over 1 year and 0.68 over 5 years.

Is TXN a good diversifier for SMH?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.63 means SMH and TXN share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.63 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/smh-vs-txn.json

SMH vs TXN: 3-year weekly correlation 0.63SMH vs TXN0.63

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![SMH vs TXN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/smh-vs-txn.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/smh-vs-txn/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: SMH correlations · TXN correlations