PairBook
HomeSMH › SMH vs SPYG

SMH vs SPYG: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) carry a correlation of 0.86, a very strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.86
very strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.76
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.84
long-run
Ann. covariance
548.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are SMH and SPYG?

Over the past 3 years, SMH and SPYG moved with a correlation of 0.86, which is very strong, meaning they move nearly in lockstep. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.76 over 1 year against 0.86 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.84, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 548.5 %².

Within SMH's tracked universe of 88 assets, SPYG comes in at #6 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: SMH led by 70.7 percentage points, +93.1% for SMH against +22.4% for SPYG. The rolling one-year correlation stayed in a tight band between 0.75 and 0.92 over the past three years, which points to a structural rather than episodic relationship. Risk is not evenly split, since SMH carries 1.8 times the volatility of the other side.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
How the one-year correlation itself moved over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

SMH vs SPYG: side by side

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF)SPYG (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF)
1-year return+93.1%+22.4%
5-year return+332.8%+85.9%
Volatility (ann.)33.7%18.9%
Beta vs S&P 5001.911.25
Max drawdown (3Y)-35.7%-22.1%
Dividend yield0.49%
Expense ratio0.04%
Assets under management$52.2B
Sector / categoryETF · ThematicETF · US Style
Smaller drawdown: SPYG -22.1% vs -35.7%Higher 5y return: SMH +332.8% vs +85.9%

SPYG is a Large Growth fund from State Street Investment Management: $52.2B under management, 148 holdings, a 0.04% expense ratio, a 0.49% trailing dividend yield.

-5%0%+126%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). SMH · SPYG

Year-by-year returns

YearSMHSPYG
2022-33.5%-29.4%
2023+73.4%+30.0%
2024+39.1%+36.0%
2025+49.2%+22.1%
2026+59.1%+14.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are SMH and SPYG good diversifiers for each other?

No. With a correlation of 0.86, SMH and SPYG move nearly in lockstep, so holding both adds very little diversification.

FAQ

What is the correlation between SMH and SPYG?

The SMH/SPYG correlation stands at 0.86 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.76, 5 years: 0.84), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SPYG a good diversifier for SMH?

No. With a correlation of 0.86, SMH and SPYG move nearly in lockstep, so holding both adds very little diversification.

What does a correlation of 0.86 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.86 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/smh-vs-spyg.json

SMH vs SPYG: 3-year weekly correlation 0.86SMH vs SPYG0.86

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![SMH vs SPYG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/smh-vs-spyg.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/smh-vs-spyg/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: SMH correlations · SPYG correlations