PairBook
HomeSMG › SMG vs VXZ

SMG vs VXZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (The) (SMG) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.24, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.28
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.36
long-run
Ann. covariance
-239.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are SMG and VXZ?

Over the past 3 years, SMG and VXZ moved with a correlation of -0.24, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.28 over 1 year against -0.24 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.36, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -239.2 %².

VXZ is close to the least connected end of SMG's tracked universe, ranking #12 of 12. The last year tells two different stories: SMG led by 17.9 percentage points, +1.8% for SMG against -16.1% for VXZ. One caveat on sizing: SMG is 1.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

SMG vs VXZ: side by side

SMG (Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (The))VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+1.8%-16.1%
5-year return-53.4%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)38.9%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.76-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-47.4%-36.4%
Market cap$3.5B
P/E (trailing)23.4
Dividend yield4.30%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -47.4%Higher 5y return: VXZ -53.1% vs -53.4%
-16%0%+16%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. SMG · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearSMGVXZ
2022-68.8%+0.5%
2023+36.9%-44.0%
2024+8.3%-12.7%
2025-8.0%+5.7%
2026+7.2%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are SMG and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between SMG and VXZ?

The SMG/VXZ correlation stands at -0.24 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.28, 5 years: -0.36), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for SMG?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.24 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/smg-vs-vxz.json

SMG vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24SMG vs VXZ-0.24

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![SMG vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/smg-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/smg-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: SMG correlations · VXZ correlations