SELF vs TACT: Correlation
Global Self Storage, Inc. (SELF) and TransAct Technologies Incorporated (TACT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.32.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are SELF and TACT?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of SELF and TACT correlate at -0.32, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.42 over 1 year against -0.32 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.05, with an annualized covariance of -280.5 %².
TACT is close to the least connected end of SELF's tracked universe, ranking #14 of 14. On 12-month performance TACT holds a 13.5-point edge, +10.0% against +23.5%. Note the risk asymmetry: TACT runs 2.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
SELF vs TACT: side by side
| SELF (Global Self Storage, Inc.) | TACT (TransAct Technologies Incorporated) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +10.0% | +23.5% |
| 5-year return | +36.6% | -64.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 20.6% | 42.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.15 | 0.56 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -15.9% | -59.0% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | 31.1 | – |
| Dividend yield | 5.14% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | SELF | TACT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -10.0% | -42.0% |
| 2023 | +0.8% | +10.4% |
| 2024 | +22.0% | -41.4% |
| 2025 | +1.2% | -2.2% |
| 2026 | +13.0% | +26.9% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are SELF and TACT good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.32 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between SELF and TACT?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.32 over 3 years, with -0.42 over the last year and -0.05 over 5 years.
Is TACT a good diversifier for SELF?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.32 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.32 mean?
A reading of -0.32 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/self-vs-tact.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/self-vs-tact/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: SELF correlations · TACT correlations
