PairBook
HomeCBIO › CBIO vs SELF

CBIO vs SELF: Correlation

Crescent Biopharma, Inc. (CBIO) and Global Self Storage, Inc. (SELF) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.27.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.27
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.01
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.05
long-run
Ann. covariance
-659.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CBIO and SELF?

On 3 years of weekly data the CBIO/SELF correlation comes out at -0.27, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.01) than the 3-year average (-0.27). The 5-year figure is -0.05, and annualized covariance runs at -659.7 %².

SELF is close to the least connected end of CBIO's tracked universe, ranking #16 of 16. The trailing year gives CBIO the advantage: +24.6% versus +10.0%, a 14.6-point spread. Note the risk asymmetry: CBIO runs 5.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CBIO vs SELF: side by side

CBIO (Crescent Biopharma, Inc.)SELF (Global Self Storage, Inc.)
1-year return+24.6%+10.0%
5-year return-107.8%+36.6%
Volatility (ann.)117.9%20.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.300.15
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.4%-15.9%
Market cap$0.7B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)31.1
Dividend yield0.00%5.14%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: SELF 5.14% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: SELF -15.9% vs -97.4%Higher 5y return: SELF +36.6% vs -107.8%
-37%0%+74%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CBIO · SELF

Year-by-year returns

YearCBIOSELF
2022-275.3%-10.0%
2023-15.0%+0.8%
2024-89.4%+22.0%
2025-52.6%+1.2%
2026+49.7%+13.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CBIO and SELF good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.27, CBIO and SELF have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CBIO and SELF?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CBIO and SELF is -0.27 over 3 years, 0.01 over 1 year and -0.05 over 5 years.

Is SELF a good diversifier for CBIO?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.27, CBIO and SELF have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?

A reading of -0.27 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cbio-vs-self.json

CBIO vs SELF: 3-year weekly correlation -0.27CBIO vs SELF-0.27

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CBIO vs SELF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cbio-vs-self.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cbio-vs-self/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CBIO correlations · SELF correlations