SANM vs VXZ: Correlation
How closely do Sanmina Corporation (SANM) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.33, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are SANM and VXZ?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of SANM and VXZ correlate at -0.33, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.24) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.33, with an annualized covariance of -398.7 %².
Out of 10 assets tracked against SANM, VXZ lands near the bottom at #9. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SANM outperformed by 90.0 percentage points (+73.9% for SANM against -16.1% for VXZ). One caveat on sizing: SANM is 1.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
SANM vs VXZ: side by side
| SANM (Sanmina Corporation) | VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +73.9% | -16.1% |
| 5-year return | +410.5% | -53.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 46.6% | 25.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.34 | -1.31 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -42.0% | -36.4% |
| Market cap | $10.9B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 35.6 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | – |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | SANM | VXZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +38.2% | +0.5% |
| 2023 | -10.3% | -44.0% |
| 2024 | +47.3% | -12.7% |
| 2025 | +98.3% | +5.7% |
| 2026 | +35.5% | -10.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are SANM and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.33 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between SANM and VXZ?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between SANM and VXZ is -0.33 over 3 years, -0.24 over 1 year and -0.33 over 5 years.
Is VXZ a good diversifier for SANM?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.33 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.33 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/sanm-vs-vxz.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/sanm-vs-vxz/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: SANM correlations · VXZ correlations
