PairBook
HomeJBL › JBL vs SANM

JBL vs SANM: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Jabil (JBL) and Sanmina Corporation (SANM) carry a correlation of 0.56, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.56
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.58
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.59
long-run
Ann. covariance
1053.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are JBL and SANM?

On 3 years of weekly data the JBL/SANM correlation comes out at 0.56, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.58 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.59, and annualized covariance runs at 1053.8 %².

Within JBL's tracked universe of 34 assets, SANM comes in at #15 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SANM outperformed by 23.5 percentage points (+50.4% for JBL against +73.9% for SANM).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

JBL vs SANM: side by side

JBL (Jabil)SANM (Sanmina Corporation)
1-year return+50.4%+73.9%
5-year return+405.5%+410.5%
Volatility (ann.)40.6%46.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.471.34
Max drawdown (3Y)-36.8%-42.0%
Market cap$32.7B$10.9B
P/E (trailing)38.935.6
Dividend yield0.10%0.00%
Sector / categoryInformation TechnologyUS Listed
Lower P/E: SANM 35.6 vs 38.9Higher yield: JBL 0.10% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: JBL -36.8% vs -42.0%Higher 5y return: SANM +410.5% vs +405.5%
-8%0%+115%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. JBL · SANM

Year-by-year returns

YearJBLSANM
2022-2.5%+38.2%
2023+87.4%-10.3%
2024+13.3%+47.3%
2025+58.7%+98.3%
2026+37.0%+35.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are JBL and SANM good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.56 means JBL and SANM share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between JBL and SANM?

The JBL/SANM correlation stands at 0.56 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.58, 5 years: 0.59), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SANM a good diversifier for JBL?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.56 means JBL and SANM share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.56 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/jbl-vs-sanm.json

JBL vs SANM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.56JBL vs SANM0.56

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![JBL vs SANM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/jbl-vs-sanm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/jbl-vs-sanm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: JBL correlations · SANM correlations