PairBook
HomeSAMG › SAMG vs WRBY

SAMG vs WRBY: Correlation

How closely do Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG) and Warby Parker Inc. (WRBY) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.45, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.45
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.42
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.41
long-run
Ann. covariance
766.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are SAMG and WRBY?

On 3 years of weekly data the SAMG/WRBY correlation comes out at 0.45, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.42 over 1 year against 0.45 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.41, and annualized covariance runs at 766.5 %².

Within SAMG's tracked universe of 13 assets, WRBY comes in at #7 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: WRBY led by 30.9 percentage points, -35.6% for SAMG against -4.7% for WRBY. One caveat on sizing: WRBY is 2.3 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

SAMG vs WRBY: side by side

SAMG (Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.)WRBY (Warby Parker Inc.)
1-year return-35.6%-4.7%
5-year return-20.3%-53.6%
Volatility (ann.)27.4%62.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.751.49
Max drawdown (3Y)-44.1%-50.7%
Market cap$0.1B$3.1B
P/E (trailing)72.3421.2
Dividend yield4.21%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: SAMG 72.3 vs 421.2Higher yield: SAMG 4.21% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: SAMG -44.1% vs -50.7%Higher 5y return: SAMG -20.3% vs -53.6%
-35%0%+14%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. SAMG · WRBY

Year-by-year returns

YearSAMGWRBY
2022+13.6%-71.0%
2023-5.7%+4.5%
2024+13.3%+71.7%
2025-13.0%-10.0%
2026-31.1%+16.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are SAMG and WRBY good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.45, SAMG and WRBY keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between SAMG and WRBY?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between SAMG and WRBY is 0.45 over 3 years, 0.42 over 1 year and 0.41 over 5 years.

Is WRBY a good diversifier for SAMG?

Reasonably. At 0.45, SAMG and WRBY keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.45 mean?

A reading of 0.45 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/samg-vs-wrby.json

SAMG vs WRBY: 3-year weekly correlation 0.45SAMG vs WRBY0.45

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![SAMG vs WRBY correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/samg-vs-wrby.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/samg-vs-wrby/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: SAMG correlations · WRBY correlations