FMNB vs SAMG: Correlation
Farmers National Banc Corp. (FMNB) and Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.58.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FMNB and SAMG?
Over the past 3 years, FMNB and SAMG moved with a correlation of 0.58, which is moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.39) than the 3-year average (0.58). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.43, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 441.0 %².
Within FMNB's tracked universe of 20 assets, SAMG comes in at #11 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months FMNB outperformed by 45.9 percentage points (+10.3% for FMNB against -35.6% for SAMG).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FMNB vs SAMG: side by side
| FMNB (Farmers National Banc Corp.) | SAMG (Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +10.3% | -35.6% |
| 5-year return | +27.6% | -20.3% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 27.7% | 27.4% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.71 | 0.75 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -23.6% | -44.1% |
| Market cap | $0.9B | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | 10.6 | 72.3 |
| Dividend yield | 4.34% | 4.21% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FMNB | SAMG |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -20.6% | +13.6% |
| 2023 | +7.8% | -5.7% |
| 2024 | +3.4% | +13.3% |
| 2025 | -1.7% | -13.0% |
| 2026 | +21.3% | -31.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FMNB and SAMG good diversifiers for each other?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.58 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FMNB and SAMG?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.58 over 3 years, with 0.39 over the last year and 0.43 over 5 years.
Is SAMG a good diversifier for FMNB?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.58 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
What does a correlation of 0.58 mean?
A reading of 0.58 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fmnb-vs-samg.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fmnb-vs-samg/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FMNB correlations · SAMG correlations
