PairBook
HomeRL › RL vs XLY

RL vs XLY: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) carry a correlation of 0.46, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.46
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.46
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.55
long-run
Ann. covariance
306.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are RL and XLY?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of RL and XLY correlate at 0.46, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.46 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.55, with an annualized covariance of 306.7 %².

Within RL's tracked universe of 42 assets, XLY comes in at #18 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: RL led by 20.8 percentage points, +20.7% for RL against -0.1% for XLY. On a rolling one-year basis the correlation drifted between 0.34 and 0.60, a moderate band. Note the risk asymmetry: RL runs 1.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
One-year correlation, rolled weekly across the last three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

RL vs XLY: side by side

RL (Ralph Lauren Corporation)XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return+20.7%-0.1%
5-year return+232.5%+31.8%
Volatility (ann.)33.6%19.7%
Beta vs S&P 5001.071.15
Max drawdown (3Y)-36.2%-26.0%
Market cap$21.0B
P/E (trailing)22.8
Dividend yield1.03%0.78%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$22.5B
Sector / categoryConsumer DiscretionarySector ETF
Higher yield: RL 1.03% vs 0.78%Smaller drawdown: XLY -26.0% vs -36.2%Higher 5y return: RL +232.5% vs +31.8%

XLY is a Consumer Cyclical fund from State Street Investment Management: $22.5B under management, 47 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 0.78% trailing dividend yield.

-10%0%+34%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). RL · XLY

Year-by-year returns

YearRLXLY
2022-8.4%-36.3%
2023+39.8%+39.6%
2024+62.9%+26.5%
2025+55.0%+7.4%
2026+0.0%-2.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Fund exposure

Keep in mind that XLY holds RL at a 0.35% weight, which makes a slice of this correlation mechanical rather than coincidental.

Are RL and XLY good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.46, RL and XLY keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between RL and XLY?

The RL/XLY correlation stands at 0.46 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.46, 5 years: 0.55), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is XLY a good diversifier for RL?

Reasonably. At 0.46, RL and XLY keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.46 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/rl-vs-xly.json

RL vs XLY: 3-year weekly correlation 0.46RL vs XLY0.46

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![RL vs XLY correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/rl-vs-xly.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/rl-vs-xly/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: RL correlations · XLY correlations