RL vs TPR: Correlation
Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.55.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are RL and TPR?
Over the past 3 years, RL and TPR moved with a correlation of 0.55, which is moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.40) runs below the 3-year figure (0.55). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.61, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 695.4 %².
Within RL's tracked universe of 42 assets, TPR comes in at #5 by 3-year correlation. Their 12-month results are close: +20.7% for RL against +23.6% for TPR. Across three years, the rolling one-year figure varied moderately, from 0.38 to 0.74.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
RL vs TPR: side by side
| RL (Ralph Lauren Corporation) | TPR (Tapestry, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +20.7% | +23.6% |
| 5-year return | +232.5% | +240.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 33.6% | 37.8% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.07 | 1.05 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -36.2% | -31.8% |
| Market cap | $21.0B | $24.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | 22.8 | 17.9 |
| Dividend yield | 1.03% | 1.23% |
| Sector / category | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | RL | TPR |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -8.4% | -3.3% |
| 2023 | +39.8% | +0.2% |
| 2024 | +62.9% | +82.8% |
| 2025 | +55.0% | +98.7% |
| 2026 | +0.0% | -3.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are RL and TPR good diversifiers for each other?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.55 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
FAQ
What is the correlation between RL and TPR?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.55 over 3 years, with 0.40 over the last year and 0.61 over 5 years.
Is TPR a good diversifier for RL?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.55 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
What does a correlation of 0.55 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.55 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/rl-vs-tpr.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/rl-vs-tpr/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: RL correlations · TPR correlations
