PairBook
HomeRKTO › RKTO vs STZ

RKTO vs STZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Rocket One Inc. (RKTO) and Constellation Brands (STZ) carry a correlation of -0.35, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.35
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.37
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.22
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1261.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are RKTO and STZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of RKTO and STZ correlate at -0.35, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.37) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.22, with an annualized covariance of -1261.0 %².

STZ is close to the least connected end of RKTO's tracked universe, ranking #30 of 30. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with STZ ahead by 24.6 points (-40.3% versus -15.7%). Note the risk asymmetry: RKTO runs 5.1 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

RKTO vs STZ: side by side

RKTO (Rocket One Inc.)STZ (Constellation Brands)
1-year return-40.3%-15.7%
5-year return-97.7%-31.9%
Volatility (ann.)135.8%26.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.300.41
Max drawdown (3Y)-81.1%-51.3%
Market cap$22.4B
P/E (trailing)12.8
Dividend yield0.00%3.04%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Higher yield: STZ 3.04% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: STZ -51.3% vs -81.1%Higher 5y return: STZ -31.9% vs -97.7%
-61%0%+35%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. RKTO · STZ

Year-by-year returns

YearRKTOSTZ
2022-52.7%-6.4%
2023-81.5%+5.8%
2024-48.1%-7.1%
2025+32.4%-36.0%
2026-27.1%-2.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are RKTO and STZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.35, RKTO and STZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between RKTO and STZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.35 over 3 years, with -0.37 over the last year and -0.22 over 5 years.

Is STZ a good diversifier for RKTO?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.35, RKTO and STZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.35 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.35 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/rkto-vs-stz.json

RKTO vs STZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.35RKTO vs STZ-0.35

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![RKTO vs STZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/rkto-vs-stz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/rkto-vs-stz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: RKTO correlations · STZ correlations