PairBook
HomeRF › RF vs TRT

RF vs TRT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Trio-Tech International (TRT) carry a correlation of -0.14, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.14
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.28
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.04
long-run
Ann. covariance
-444.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are RF and TRT?

Over the past 3 years, RF and TRT moved with a correlation of -0.14, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.28 versus -0.14 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.04, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -444.1 %².

Among the 44 assets we track against RF, TRT ranks #36 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months TRT outperformed by 280.1 percentage points (+15.4% for RF against +295.5% for TRT). Risk is not evenly split, since TRT carries 3.7 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

RF vs TRT: side by side

RF (Regions Financial Corporation)TRT (Trio-Tech International)
1-year return+15.4%+295.5%
5-year return+83.5%+365.8%
Volatility (ann.)29.2%107.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.090.18
Max drawdown (3Y)-31.9%-54.6%
Market cap$25.9B
P/E (trailing)12.4209.6
Dividend yield3.45%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Lower P/E: RF 12.4 vs 209.6Higher yield: RF 3.45% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: RF -31.9% vs -54.6%Higher 5y return: TRT +365.8% vs +83.5%
-13%0%+647%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). RF · TRT

Year-by-year returns

YearRFTRT
2022+2.3%-66.5%
2023-5.7%+12.7%
2024+27.0%+14.6%
2025+20.2%+127.9%
2026+14.3%+58.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are RF and TRT good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.14 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between RF and TRT?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.14 over 3 years, with -0.28 over the last year and -0.04 over 5 years.

Is TRT a good diversifier for RF?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.14 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.14 mean?

A reading of -0.14 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/rf-vs-trt.json

RF vs TRT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.14RF vs TRT-0.14

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![RF vs TRT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/rf-vs-trt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/rf-vs-trt/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: RF correlations · TRT correlations