PairBook
HomeRF › RF vs VXZ

RF vs VXZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.56, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.56
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.46
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.55
long-run
Ann. covariance
-420.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are RF and VXZ?

On 3 years of weekly data the RF/VXZ correlation comes out at -0.56, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.46 versus -0.56 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.55, and annualized covariance runs at -420.9 %².

Among the 44 assets we track against RF, VXZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #44. The last year tells two different stories: RF led by 31.5 percentage points, +15.4% for RF against -16.1% for VXZ.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

RF vs VXZ: side by side

RF (Regions Financial Corporation)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+15.4%-16.1%
5-year return+83.5%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)29.2%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.09-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-31.9%-36.4%
Market cap$25.9B
P/E (trailing)12.4
Dividend yield3.45%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: RF -31.9% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: RF +83.5% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+22%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. RF · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearRFVXZ
2022+2.3%+0.5%
2023-5.7%-44.0%
2024+27.0%-12.7%
2025+20.2%+5.7%
2026+14.3%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are RF and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.56 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between RF and VXZ?

The RF/VXZ correlation stands at -0.56 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.46, 5 years: -0.55), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for RF?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.56 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.56 mean?

A reading of -0.56 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/rf-vs-vxz.json

RF vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.56RF vs VXZ-0.56

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![RF vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/rf-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/rf-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: RF correlations · VXZ correlations