PairBook
HomeRF › RF vs TCRT

RF vs TCRT: Correlation

Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Alaunos Therapeutics, Inc. (TCRT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.14.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.14
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.19
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.05
long-run
Ann. covariance
-515.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are RF and TCRT?

Over the past 3 years, RF and TCRT moved with a correlation of -0.14, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.19 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.05, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -515.5 %².

Among the 44 assets we track against RF, TCRT ranks #35 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: RF led by 27.6 percentage points, +15.4% for RF against -12.2% for TCRT. Note the risk asymmetry: TCRT runs 4.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

RF vs TCRT: side by side

RF (Regions Financial Corporation)TCRT (Alaunos Therapeutics, Inc.)
1-year return+15.4%-12.2%
5-year return+83.5%-99.3%
Volatility (ann.)29.2%121.9%
Beta vs S&P 5001.09-1.11
Max drawdown (3Y)-31.9%-95.0%
Market cap$25.9B
P/E (trailing)12.4
Dividend yield3.45%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Higher yield: RF 3.45% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: RF -31.9% vs -95.0%Higher 5y return: RF +83.5% vs -99.3%
-23%0%+97%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. RF · TCRT

Year-by-year returns

YearRFTCRT
2022+2.3%-40.4%
2023-5.7%-89.2%
2024+27.0%-81.8%
2025+20.2%+69.1%
2026+14.3%-48.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are RF and TCRT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.14, RF and TCRT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between RF and TCRT?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.14 over 3 years, with -0.19 over the last year and -0.05 over 5 years.

Is TCRT a good diversifier for RF?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.14, RF and TCRT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.14 mean?

A reading of -0.14 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/rf-vs-tcrt.json

RF vs TCRT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.14RF vs TCRT-0.14

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![RF vs TCRT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/rf-vs-tcrt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/rf-vs-tcrt/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: RF correlations · TCRT correlations