PairBook
HomeRCON › RCON vs TXT

RCON vs TXT: Correlation

Recon Technology, Ltd. - Class A (RCON) and Textron (TXT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.20.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.34
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-70673.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are RCON and TXT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of RCON and TXT correlate at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.34) than the 3-year average (-0.20). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.15, with an annualized covariance of -70673.9 %².

By 3-year correlation, TXT places #28 of the 48 assets tracked against RCON. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with TXT ahead by 23.3 points (-22.6% versus +0.7%). Note the risk asymmetry: RCON runs 540.5 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

RCON vs TXT: side by side

RCON (Recon Technology, Ltd. - Class A)TXT (Textron)
1-year return-22.6%+0.7%
5-year return-97.1%+15.1%
Volatility (ann.)13728.9%25.4%
Beta vs S&P 50022.040.89
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-37.3%
Market cap$14.2B
P/E (trailing)15.7
Dividend yield0.00%0.10%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Higher yield: TXT 0.10% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: TXT -37.3% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: TXT +15.1% vs -97.1%
-98%0%+4344%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. RCON · TXT

Year-by-year returns

YearRCONTXT
2022-3.8%-8.2%
2023-81.7%+13.7%
2024-49.5%-4.8%
2025-24.4%+14.1%
2026+10.8%-5.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are RCON and TXT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, RCON and TXT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between RCON and TXT?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between RCON and TXT is -0.20 over 3 years, -0.34 over 1 year and -0.15 over 5 years.

Is TXT a good diversifier for RCON?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, RCON and TXT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/rcon-vs-txt.json

RCON vs TXT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20RCON vs TXT-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![RCON vs TXT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/rcon-vs-txt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/rcon-vs-txt/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: RCON correlations · TXT correlations