PairBook
HomeMNST › MNST vs RCON

MNST vs RCON: Correlation

How closely do Monster Beverage (MNST) and Recon Technology, Ltd. - Class A (RCON) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.58, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.58
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.62
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.56
long-run
Ann. covariance
-550196.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MNST and RCON?

On 3 years of weekly data the MNST/RCON correlation comes out at -0.58, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.62 over 1 year against -0.58 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.56, and annualized covariance runs at -550196.4 %².

Among the 66 assets we track against MNST, RCON ranks #56 by 3-year correlation. Twelve-month performance is nearly a tie, at -24.3% for MNST and -22.6% for RCON. One caveat on sizing: RCON is 200.1 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MNST vs RCON: side by side

MNST (Monster Beverage)RCON (Recon Technology, Ltd. - Class A)
1-year return-24.3%-22.6%
5-year return-4.5%-97.1%
Volatility (ann.)68.6%13728.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.8022.04
Max drawdown (3Y)-54.5%-100.0%
Market cap$91.5B
P/E (trailing)43.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer StaplesUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MNST -54.5% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: MNST -4.5% vs -97.1%
-98%0%+4344%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. MNST · RCON

Year-by-year returns

YearMNSTRCON
2022+5.7%-3.8%
2023+13.5%-81.7%
2024-8.8%-49.5%
2025+45.9%-24.4%
2026-39.1%+10.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MNST and RCON good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.58, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MNST and RCON?

The MNST/RCON correlation stands at -0.58 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.62, 5 years: -0.56), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is RCON a good diversifier for MNST?

Yes: at -0.58, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.58 mean?

A reading of -0.58 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mnst-vs-rcon.json

MNST vs RCON: 3-year weekly correlation -0.58MNST vs RCON-0.58

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![MNST vs RCON correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mnst-vs-rcon.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mnst-vs-rcon/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MNST correlations · RCON correlations