RBLX vs VZ: Correlation
Roblox Corporation (RBLX) and Verizon (VZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are RBLX and VZ?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of RBLX and VZ correlate at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.29 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.09, with an annualized covariance of -300.9 %².
Among the 13 assets we track against RBLX, VZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #10. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VZ ahead by 88.2 points (-68.9% versus +19.3%). Risk is not evenly split, since RBLX carries 2.4 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
RBLX vs VZ: side by side
| RBLX (Roblox Corporation) | VZ (Verizon) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -68.9% | +19.3% |
| 5-year return | -53.4% | +23.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 54.8% | 22.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.26 | 0.15 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -74.9% | -17.0% |
| Market cap | $27.3B | $205.4B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 12.9 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 5.57% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Communication Services |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | RBLX | VZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -72.4% | -20.0% |
| 2023 | +60.6% | +2.7% |
| 2024 | +26.6% | +13.1% |
| 2025 | +40.0% | +8.9% |
| 2026 | -52.9% | +27.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are RBLX and VZ good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, RBLX and VZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between RBLX and VZ?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between RBLX and VZ is -0.24 over 3 years, -0.29 over 1 year and -0.09 over 5 years.
Is VZ a good diversifier for RBLX?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, RBLX and VZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.24 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/rblx-vs-vz.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/rblx-vs-vz/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: RBLX correlations · VZ correlations
