PairBook
HomeRARE › RARE vs SOC

RARE vs SOC: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE) and Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carry a correlation of -0.26, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.45
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.20
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1342.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are RARE and SOC?

Over the past 3 years, RARE and SOC moved with a correlation of -0.26, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.45) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.26). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.20, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1342.0 %².

SOC is close to the least connected end of RARE's tracked universe, ranking #12 of 14. The last year tells two different stories: RARE led by 70.9 percentage points, -12.7% for RARE against -83.6% for SOC. One caveat on sizing: SOC is 2.0 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

RARE vs SOC: side by side

RARE (Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.)SOC (Sable Offshore Corp.)
1-year return-12.7%-83.6%
5-year return-72.6%-51.7%
Volatility (ann.)51.1%101.7%
Beta vs S&P 5001.380.03
Max drawdown (3Y)-68.8%-90.7%
Market cap$2.6B$0.9B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: RARE -68.8% vs -90.7%Higher 5y return: SOC -51.7% vs -72.6%
-83%0%+14%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. RARE · SOC

Year-by-year returns

YearRARESOC
2022-44.9%+3.4%
2023+3.2%+13.3%
2024-12.0%+101.1%
2025-45.3%-60.6%
2026+14.2%-48.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are RARE and SOC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, RARE and SOC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between RARE and SOC?

The RARE/SOC correlation stands at -0.26 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.45, 5 years: -0.20), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SOC a good diversifier for RARE?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, RARE and SOC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.26 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/rare-vs-soc.json

RARE vs SOC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26RARE vs SOC-0.26

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![RARE vs SOC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/rare-vs-soc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/rare-vs-soc/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: RARE correlations · SOC correlations