PairBook
HomeQQQM › QQQM vs SMCI

QQQM vs SMCI: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) and Supermicro (SMCI) carry a correlation of 0.46, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.46
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.42
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.39
long-run
Ann. covariance
955.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are QQQM and SMCI?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of QQQM and SMCI correlate at 0.46, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.42) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.39, with an annualized covariance of 955.8 %².

Among the 103 assets we track against QQQM, SMCI ranks #82 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: QQQM led by 40.5 percentage points, +26.4% for QQQM against -14.1% for SMCI. The rolling one-year correlation moved between 0.31 and 0.57 over the past three years, a moderate range. Note the risk asymmetry: SMCI runs 5.5 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

QQQM vs SMCI: side by side

QQQM (Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF)SMCI (Supermicro)
1-year return+26.4%-14.1%
5-year return+96.1%+983.4%
Volatility (ann.)19.5%107.1%
Beta vs S&P 5001.283.08
Max drawdown (3Y)-22.7%-84.8%
Market cap$24.9B
P/E (trailing)11.5
Dividend yield0.46%0.00%
Expense ratio0.15%
Assets under management$97.1B
Sector / categoryETF · US Growth & TechInformation Technology
Higher yield: QQQM 0.46% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: QQQM -22.7% vs -84.8%Higher 5y return: SMCI +983.4% vs +96.1%

QQQM, Invesco's Large Growth fund, carries $97.1B under management, 105 holdings, a 0.15% expense ratio, a 0.46% trailing dividend yield.

-49%0%+31%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. QQQM · SMCI

Year-by-year returns

YearQQQMSMCI
2022-32.5%+86.8%
2023+55.0%+246.2%
2024+25.7%+7.2%
2025+20.9%-4.0%
2026+17.7%+31.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are QQQM and SMCI good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.46, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between QQQM and SMCI?

The QQQM/SMCI correlation stands at 0.46 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.42, 5 years: 0.39), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SMCI a good diversifier for QQQM?

A fair diversifier. At 0.46, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.46 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/qqqm-vs-smci.json

QQQM vs SMCI: 3-year weekly correlation 0.46QQQM vs SMCI0.46

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![QQQM vs SMCI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/qqqm-vs-smci.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/qqqm-vs-smci/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: QQQM correlations · SMCI correlations