PairBook
HomeFNGD › FNGD vs QQQM

FNGD vs QQQM: Correlation

How closely do MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.93, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.93
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.90
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.92
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1367.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FNGD and QQQM?

Over the past 3 years, FNGD and QQQM moved with a correlation of -0.93, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.90) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.92, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1367.8 %².

Among the 1743 assets we track against FNGD, QQQM sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #1740. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months QQQM outperformed by 82.1 percentage points (-55.7% for FNGD against +26.4% for QQQM). Note the risk asymmetry: FNGD runs 3.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FNGD vs QQQM: side by side

FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due)QQQM (Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF)
1-year return-55.7%+26.4%
5-year return-99.4%+96.1%
Volatility (ann.)75.7%19.5%
Beta vs S&P 500-4.541.28
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.6%-22.7%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)20.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.46%
Expense ratio0.15%
Assets under management$97.1B
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · US Growth & Tech
Higher yield: QQQM 0.46% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: QQQM -22.7% vs -97.6%Higher 5y return: QQQM +96.1% vs -99.4%

QQQM is a Large Growth fund from Invesco: $97.1B under management, 105 holdings, a 0.15% expense ratio, a 0.46% trailing dividend yield.

-52%0%+49%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FNGD · QQQM

Year-by-year returns

YearFNGDQQQM
2022+52.2%-32.5%
2023-90.1%+55.0%
2024-76.6%+25.7%
2025-61.4%+20.9%
2026-49.5%+17.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FNGD and QQQM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.93, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FNGD and QQQM?

The FNGD/QQQM correlation stands at -0.93 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.90, 5 years: -0.92), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is QQQM a good diversifier for FNGD?

Yes: at -0.93, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.93 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-qqqm.json

FNGD vs QQQM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.93FNGD vs QQQM-0.93

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FNGD vs QQQM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fngd-vs-qqqm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-qqqm/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FNGD correlations · QQQM correlations