PairBook
HomePM › PM vs XLP

PM vs XLP: Correlation

Philip Morris International (PM) and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.49.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.49
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.60
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.57
long-run
Ann. covariance
126.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PM and XLP?

On 3 years of weekly data the PM/XLP correlation comes out at 0.49, moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.60) than the 3-year average (0.49). The 5-year figure is 0.57, and annualized covariance runs at 126.9 %².

In PM's tracked universe of 47 assets, XLP sits right near the top at #3. Over the last 12 months PM came out ahead by 11.9 percentage points (+20.2% against +8.3%). Across three years, the rolling one-year figure varied moderately, from 0.24 to 0.67. Risk is not evenly split, since PM carries 2.1 times the volatility of the other side.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PM vs XLP: side by side

PM (Philip Morris International)XLP (Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return+20.2%+8.3%
5-year return+133.5%+34.7%
Volatility (ann.)23.1%11.1%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.010.23
Max drawdown (3Y)-20.6%-9.7%
Market cap$296.9B
P/E (trailing)26.7
Dividend yield3.03%2.58%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$14.6B
Sector / categoryConsumer StaplesSector ETF
Higher yield: PM 3.03% vs 2.58%Smaller drawdown: XLP -9.7% vs -20.6%Higher 5y return: PM +133.5% vs +34.7%

On the fund side, XLP sits in the Consumer Defensive category at State Street Investment Management, with $14.6B under management, 35 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 2.58% trailing dividend yield.

-10%0%+24%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. PM · XLP

Year-by-year returns

YearPMXLP
2022+12.3%-0.8%
2023-1.9%-0.8%
2024+34.3%+12.2%
2025+38.0%+1.5%
2026+20.8%+10.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Fund exposure

Keep in mind that XLP holds PM at a 6.36% weight, which makes a slice of this correlation mechanical rather than coincidental.

Are PM and XLP good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.49, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PM and XLP?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between PM and XLP is 0.49 over 3 years, 0.60 over 1 year and 0.57 over 5 years.

Is XLP a good diversifier for PM?

A fair diversifier. At 0.49, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.49 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.49 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/pm-vs-xlp.json

PM vs XLP: 3-year weekly correlation 0.49PM vs XLP0.49

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![PM vs XLP correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/pm-vs-xlp.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/pm-vs-xlp/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PM correlations · XLP correlations