PairBook
HomeICLR › ICLR vs PM

ICLR vs PM: Correlation

ICON plc (ICLR) and Philip Morris International (PM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.32.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.32
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.30
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.11
long-run
Ann. covariance
-373.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ICLR and PM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ICLR and PM correlate at -0.32, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.30) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.11, with an annualized covariance of -373.5 %².

Out of 11 assets tracked against ICLR, PM lands near the bottom at #11. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with PM ahead by 22.7 points (-2.5% versus +20.2%). One caveat on sizing: ICLR is 2.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ICLR vs PM: side by side

ICLR (ICON plc)PM (Philip Morris International)
1-year return-2.5%+20.2%
5-year return-33.7%+133.5%
Volatility (ann.)51.4%23.1%
Beta vs S&P 5001.03-0.01
Max drawdown (3Y)-76.9%-20.6%
Market cap$13.1B$296.9B
P/E (trailing)265.226.7
Dividend yield0.00%3.03%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Lower P/E: PM 26.7 vs 265.2Higher yield: PM 3.03% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PM -20.6% vs -76.9%Higher 5y return: PM +133.5% vs -33.7%
-47%0%+24%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ICLR · PM

Year-by-year returns

YearICLRPM
2022-37.3%+12.3%
2023+45.7%-1.9%
2024-25.9%+34.3%
2025-13.1%+38.0%
2026-6.9%+20.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ICLR and PM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.32, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ICLR and PM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ICLR and PM is -0.32 over 3 years, -0.30 over 1 year and -0.11 over 5 years.

Is PM a good diversifier for ICLR?

Yes: at -0.32, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.32 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.32 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/iclr-vs-pm.json

ICLR vs PM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.32ICLR vs PM-0.32

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ICLR vs PM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/iclr-vs-pm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/iclr-vs-pm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ICLR correlations · PM correlations