PairBook
HomePM › PM vs XFOR

PM vs XFOR: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Philip Morris International (PM) and X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (XFOR) carry a correlation of -0.20, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.39
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.20
long-run
Ann. covariance
-559.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PM and XFOR?

Over the past 3 years, PM and XFOR moved with a correlation of -0.20, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.39 versus -0.20 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.20, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -559.4 %².

Within PM's tracked universe of 47 assets, XFOR comes in at #29 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with PM ahead by 20.2 points (+20.2% versus +0.0%). Risk is not evenly split, since XFOR carries 5.3 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PM vs XFOR: side by side

PM (Philip Morris International)XFOR (X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)
1-year return+20.2%+0.0%
5-year return+133.5%-97.2%
Volatility (ann.)23.1%121.6%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.011.66
Max drawdown (3Y)-20.6%-96.8%
Market cap$296.9B$0.4B
P/E (trailing)26.72.9
Dividend yield3.03%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer StaplesUS Listed
Lower P/E: XFOR 2.9 vs 26.7Higher yield: PM 3.03% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PM -20.6% vs -96.8%Higher 5y return: PM +133.5% vs -97.2%
-15%0%+33%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). PM · XFOR

Year-by-year returns

YearPMXFOR
2022+12.3%-56.6%
2023-1.9%-15.5%
2024+34.3%-12.5%
2025+38.0%-81.8%
2026+20.8%+5.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PM and XFOR good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PM and XFOR?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.20 over 3 years, with -0.39 over the last year and -0.20 over 5 years.

Is XFOR a good diversifier for PM?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

A reading of -0.20 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/pm-vs-xfor.json

PM vs XFOR: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20PM vs XFOR-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![PM vs XFOR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/pm-vs-xfor.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/pm-vs-xfor/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PM correlations · XFOR correlations