PairBook
HomePM › PM vs TRMB

PM vs TRMB: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Philip Morris International (PM) and Trimble Inc. (TRMB) carry a correlation of -0.19, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.46
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.06
long-run
Ann. covariance
-136.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PM and TRMB?

Over the past 3 years, PM and TRMB moved with a correlation of -0.19, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.46) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.19). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.06, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -136.9 %².

By 3-year correlation, TRMB places #28 of the 47 assets tracked against PM. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months PM outperformed by 45.3 percentage points (+20.2% for PM against -25.1% for TRMB). The relationship is regime-dependent: the rolling one-year correlation swung between -0.51 and 0.43 over the past three years, so this pair behaves very differently depending on the market environment.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
One-year correlation, rolled weekly across the last three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PM vs TRMB: side by side

PM (Philip Morris International)TRMB (Trimble Inc.)
1-year return+20.2%-25.1%
5-year return+133.5%-35.7%
Volatility (ann.)23.1%30.9%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.011.13
Max drawdown (3Y)-20.6%-42.7%
Market cap$296.9B$14.3B
P/E (trailing)26.7
Dividend yield3.03%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer StaplesInformation Technology
Higher yield: PM 3.03% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PM -20.6% vs -42.7%Higher 5y return: PM +133.5% vs -35.7%
-39%0%+24%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. PM · TRMB

Year-by-year returns

YearPMTRMB
2022+12.3%-42.0%
2023-1.9%+5.2%
2024+34.3%+32.8%
2025+38.0%+10.9%
2026+20.8%-21.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PM and TRMB good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PM and TRMB?

The PM/TRMB correlation stands at -0.19 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.46, 5 years: 0.06), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is TRMB a good diversifier for PM?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.19 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/pm-vs-trmb.json

PM vs TRMB: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19PM vs TRMB-0.19

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![PM vs TRMB correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/pm-vs-trmb.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/pm-vs-trmb/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PM correlations · TRMB correlations