PHM vs WSM: Correlation
How closely do PulteGroup (PHM) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.45, which is moderate.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are PHM and WSM?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of PHM and WSM correlate at 0.45, moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.69) than the 3-year average (0.45). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.46, with an annualized covariance of 623.8 %².
By 3-year correlation, WSM places #31 of the 47 assets tracked against PHM. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months WSM outperformed by 28.3 percentage points (-2.5% for PHM against +25.8% for WSM). On a rolling one-year basis the correlation drifted between 0.27 and 0.69, a moderate band.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
PHM vs WSM: side by side
| PHM (PulteGroup) | WSM (Williams-Sonoma, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -2.5% | +25.8% |
| 5-year return | +145.5% | +182.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 32.2% | 43.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.82 | 1.33 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -38.0% | -36.8% |
| Market cap | – | $28.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | 13.3 | 24.4 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 0.56% |
| Sector / category | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | PHM | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -19.2% | -30.5% |
| 2023 | +128.8% | +80.2% |
| 2024 | +6.2% | +86.6% |
| 2025 | +8.5% | -2.1% |
| 2026 | +8.6% | +34.9% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are PHM and WSM good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.45, PHM and WSM keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between PHM and WSM?
The PHM/WSM correlation stands at 0.45 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.69, 5 years: 0.46), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is WSM a good diversifier for PHM?
Reasonably. At 0.45, PHM and WSM keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.45 mean?
A reading of 0.45 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/phm-vs-wsm.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/phm-vs-wsm/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: PHM correlations · WSM correlations
