PairBook
HomePG › PG vs SHMD

PG vs SHMD: Correlation

How closely do Procter & Gamble (PG) and SCHMID Group N.V. - Class A (SHMD) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.20, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.02
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-309.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PG and SHMD?

On 3 years of weekly data the PG/SHMD correlation comes out at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.02) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.20). The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -309.1 %².

Within PG's tracked universe of 30 assets, SHMD comes in at #21 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SHMD outperformed by 34.9 percentage points (-6.1% for PG against +28.8% for SHMD). One caveat on sizing: SHMD is 6.3 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PG vs SHMD: side by side

PG (Procter & Gamble)SHMD (SCHMID Group N.V. - Class A)
1-year return-6.1%+28.8%
5-year return+13.9%n/a
Volatility (ann.)15.3%96.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.190.77
Max drawdown (3Y)-21.2%-69.6%
Market cap$332.7B$0.2B
P/E (trailing)21.9
Dividend yield2.94%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer StaplesUS Listed
Higher yield: PG 2.94% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PG -21.2% vs -69.6%
-11%0%+340%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. PG · SHMD

Year-by-year returns

YearPGSHMD
2022-5.0%
2023-0.9%
2024+17.3%
2025-12.3%+101.1%
2026+2.1%-45.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PG and SHMD good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PG and SHMD?

The PG/SHMD correlation stands at -0.20 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.02, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SHMD a good diversifier for PG?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

A reading of -0.20 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/pg-vs-shmd.json

PG vs SHMD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20PG vs SHMD-0.20

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![PG vs SHMD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/pg-vs-shmd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/pg-vs-shmd/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PG correlations · SHMD correlations