PairBook
HomeMOBX › MOBX vs PG

MOBX vs PG: Correlation

Mobix Labs, Inc. (MOBX) and Procter & Gamble (PG) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.25.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.47
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.17
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1263.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MOBX and PG?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MOBX and PG correlate at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.47) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.25). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.17, with an annualized covariance of -1263.6 %².

Among the 77 assets we track against MOBX, PG ranks #61 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months PG outperformed by 81.9 percentage points (-88.0% for MOBX against -6.1% for PG). Note the risk asymmetry: MOBX runs 21.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MOBX vs PG: side by side

MOBX (Mobix Labs, Inc.)PG (Procter & Gamble)
1-year return-88.0%-6.1%
5-year return-98.8%+13.9%
Volatility (ann.)333.1%15.3%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.620.19
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.1%-21.2%
Market cap$332.7B
P/E (trailing)21.9
Dividend yield0.00%2.94%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Higher yield: PG 2.94% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PG -21.2% vs -99.1%Higher 5y return: PG +13.9% vs -98.8%
-89%0%+6%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. MOBX · PG

Year-by-year returns

YearMOBXPG
2022+3.8%-5.0%
2023-60.6%-0.9%
2024-57.7%+17.3%
2025-84.3%-12.3%
2026-57.3%+2.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MOBX and PG good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MOBX and PG?

The MOBX/PG correlation stands at -0.25 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.47, 5 years: -0.17), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is PG a good diversifier for MOBX?

Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

A reading of -0.25 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mobx-vs-pg.json

MOBX vs PG: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25MOBX vs PG-0.25

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![MOBX vs PG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mobx-vs-pg.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mobx-vs-pg/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MOBX correlations · PG correlations