PairBook
HomePFSI › PFSI vs UWMC

PFSI vs UWMC: Correlation

How closely do PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) and UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.61, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.61
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.51
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.55
long-run
Ann. covariance
1124.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PFSI and UWMC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of PFSI and UWMC correlate at 0.61, strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.51 over 1 year against 0.61 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.55, with an annualized covariance of 1124.1 %².

In PFSI's tracked universe of 14 assets, UWMC sits right near the top at #2. The last year tells two different stories: PFSI led by 39.7 percentage points, -31.3% for PFSI against -71.0% for UWMC. One caveat on sizing: UWMC is 1.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PFSI vs UWMC: side by side

PFSI (PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.)UWMC (UWM Holdings Corporation)
1-year return-31.3%-71.0%
5-year return+17.5%-69.4%
Volatility (ann.)34.9%52.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.570.96
Max drawdown (3Y)-53.8%-84.9%
Market cap$3.8B$4.2B
P/E (trailing)10.0
Dividend yield1.65%27.40%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: UWMC 27.40% vs 1.65%Smaller drawdown: PFSI -53.8% vs -84.9%Higher 5y return: PFSI +17.5% vs -69.4%
-77%0%+36%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. PFSI · UWMC

Year-by-year returns

YearPFSIUWMC
2022-17.6%-38.0%
2023+57.8%+132.1%
2024+16.8%-13.0%
2025+30.5%-19.3%
2026-43.6%-63.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PFSI and UWMC good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.61 means PFSI and UWMC share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PFSI and UWMC?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between PFSI and UWMC is 0.61 over 3 years, 0.51 over 1 year and 0.55 over 5 years.

Is UWMC a good diversifier for PFSI?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.61 means PFSI and UWMC share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.61 mean?

A reading of 0.61 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/pfsi-vs-uwmc.json

PFSI vs UWMC: 3-year weekly correlation 0.61PFSI vs UWMC0.61

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![PFSI vs UWMC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/pfsi-vs-uwmc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/pfsi-vs-uwmc/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PFSI correlations · UWMC correlations