PairBook
HomeBATL › BATL vs PFSI

BATL vs PFSI: Correlation

Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) and PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.30.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.30
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.46
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.18
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2613.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BATL and PFSI?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BATL and PFSI correlate at -0.30, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.46 versus -0.30 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.18, with an annualized covariance of -2613.4 %².

Out of 44 assets tracked against BATL, PFSI lands near the bottom at #41. The last year tells two different stories: BATL led by 44.0 percentage points, +12.7% for BATL against -31.3% for PFSI. Risk is not evenly split, since BATL carries 7.2 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BATL vs PFSI: side by side

BATL (Battalion Oil Corporation)PFSI (PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.)
1-year return+12.7%-31.3%
5-year return-87.1%+17.5%
Volatility (ann.)252.0%34.9%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.190.57
Max drawdown (3Y)-95.8%-53.8%
Market cap$0.1B$3.8B
P/E (trailing)10.0
Dividend yield0.00%1.65%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: PFSI 1.65% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PFSI -53.8% vs -95.8%Higher 5y return: PFSI +17.5% vs -87.1%
-36%0%+1951%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BATL · PFSI

Year-by-year returns

YearBATLPFSI
2022-0.9%-17.6%
2023-1.0%+57.8%
2024-82.1%+16.8%
2025-34.3%+30.5%
2026+17.7%-43.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BATL and PFSI good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.30 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BATL and PFSI?

The BATL/PFSI correlation stands at -0.30 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.46, 5 years: -0.18), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is PFSI a good diversifier for BATL?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.30 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.30 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.30 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/batl-vs-pfsi.json

BATL vs PFSI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.30BATL vs PFSI-0.30

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BATL vs PFSI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/batl-vs-pfsi.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/batl-vs-pfsi/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BATL correlations · PFSI correlations