PairBook
HomeACNT › ACNT vs BATL

ACNT vs BATL: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Ascent Industries Co. (ACNT) and Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) carry a correlation of -0.33, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.33
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.56
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.18
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2632.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ACNT and BATL?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ACNT and BATL correlate at -0.33, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.56) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.33). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.18, with an annualized covariance of -2632.9 %².

BATL is close to the least connected end of ACNT's tracked universe, ranking #13 of 16. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with ACNT ahead by 18.3 points (+31.0% versus +12.7%). One caveat on sizing: BATL is 8.1 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ACNT vs BATL: side by side

ACNT (Ascent Industries Co.)BATL (Battalion Oil Corporation)
1-year return+31.0%+12.7%
5-year return+37.0%-87.1%
Volatility (ann.)31.2%252.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.09-0.19
Max drawdown (3Y)-31.8%-95.8%
Market cap$0.1B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: ACNT -31.8% vs -95.8%Higher 5y return: ACNT +37.0% vs -87.1%
-5%0%+1951%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ACNT · BATL

Year-by-year returns

YearACNTBATL
2022-47.2%-0.9%
2023+10.3%-1.0%
2024+16.9%-82.1%
2025+44.8%-34.3%
2026-2.4%+17.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ACNT and BATL good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.33 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ACNT and BATL?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ACNT and BATL is -0.33 over 3 years, -0.56 over 1 year and -0.18 over 5 years.

Is BATL a good diversifier for ACNT?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.33 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.33 mean?

A reading of -0.33 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/acnt-vs-batl.json

ACNT vs BATL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.33ACNT vs BATL-0.33

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ACNT vs BATL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/acnt-vs-batl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/acnt-vs-batl/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ACNT correlations · BATL correlations