PairBook
HomePFN › PFN vs VXZ

PFN vs VXZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.53, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.53
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.60
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.46
long-run
Ann. covariance
-164.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PFN and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of PFN and VXZ correlate at -0.53, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.60 over 1 year against -0.53 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.46, with an annualized covariance of -164.0 %².

Out of 18 assets tracked against PFN, VXZ lands near the bottom at #18. The last year tells two different stories: PFN led by 20.2 percentage points, +4.1% for PFN against -16.1% for VXZ. Note the risk asymmetry: VXZ runs 2.1 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PFN vs VXZ: side by side

PFN (PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+4.1%-16.1%
5-year return+9.3%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)12.2%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.40-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-11.1%-36.4%
Market cap$0.7B
P/E (trailing)13.4
Dividend yield12.40%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: PFN -11.1% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: PFN +9.3% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. PFN · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearPFNVXZ
2022-17.6%+0.5%
2023+15.5%-44.0%
2024+15.8%-12.7%
2025+13.1%+5.7%
2026+1.0%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PFN and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.53 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PFN and VXZ?

The PFN/VXZ correlation stands at -0.53 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.60, 5 years: -0.46), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for PFN?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.53 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.53 mean?

A reading of -0.53 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/pfn-vs-vxz.json

PFN vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.53PFN vs VXZ-0.53

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![PFN vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/pfn-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/pfn-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PFN correlations · VXZ correlations